Memuat Wikipedia 2.7.50532-r-2025-05-20 3

Jose M

Great app, had this on every phone for years

J. Miranda Almeida

Excellent !

T G

Very useful

Soumyadip Pal

We always believe mutiworlds' expanding nature purposes of Education or other purposes. Wikipedia is one of it. But unfortunately with most sorrowfully i am telling from the consecutive 1- 2 years i have been blocked to Wikipedia editor and still ..... i am requesting to you to kindly look forward into that.

Gene Svifson

Wikipedia is the GOAT, all the knowledge collected and easy to access. Massive thanks to all the editors and moderators keeping the world informed!

gregory frazier

I love wikipedia wikipedia is awesome

Adam

been using Wikipedia ever since I have been using the Internet... Just love this app/Website and it has changed the face of the Internet for the better ✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️

Abduselam Ahimed

student

VeryVeryJoyful

use this a lot and contribute to support the site

A Google user

It's more convenient than their website, but it does use a lot of bandwidth. A lot of little things get broken with updates (like open tabs, links to external web pages, and audio samples) and stay broken. For these reasons, you might rate this app much lower than I did. It just doesn't bother me that much.

A Google user

Was the nearby feature removed in the last update? It was my favorite part of the app and was what made it worth using over a normal web browser. Despite seemingly no longer having a great feature, the app itself is well made, with versatile UI both in look and function. I like being able to tap on a link and seeing a short overview without being taken to the page, and getting to choose from multiple themes is nice.

Joshua Comer

I really like this app a lot. I do wish however that there was a more convenient button for reloading a page without losing my place. I have to scroll all the way back up. The English Wave Function page seems to be broken. It doesn't load all the way. It shows the full article for other languages, but not for English for some reason.

Johnbo Nunya

Offline usage, SD storage and great interface. But does have one very annoying flaw, which is how incredibly easy it is to accidentally delete offline pages. There have been several occasions where I attempted to tap on an article, but ever so slightly, swiped a little to the side at the same time, which deletes the page. It dosen't ask for confirmation, but rather just removes the page in a blink of an eye. Although it does allow you to undo this, the page will have to be downloaded again.

A Google user

It *was* better, but the update(s) have now made it clumsy and difficult-to-navigate. Word to developers: the text runs *right up* to the right-side border and has some left-right movement. I'm constantly sliding the app's pages to the left so that I can read the end of the sentence. It's not looking like it was well-crafted. And the new tabbing: yuk. Somewhat poor in terms of usability. I've seen you guys do better. I know you can. I'm a donor, so maybe give a listen.

A Google user

I'm not basing this rating on Wikipedia's political biases. It's annoying that a new search actually opens a new page instead of replacing the current one. I'm deleting the app because it doesn't support "find in page" when viewing. That makes the web browser much more useful than the app. They are adding that function when editing, so the code is already there. It is not implemented to force viewers to scan the whole article.